[[I’m fairly certain this is the same guy whose theory we’ve previously reviewed and (as I recall) was dubbed “the kid” at DarwinCentral.]]
Are you speakign of Dakota? If so, do you recall what you concluded abotu his hteories? I think there is a connection between what he theorizes, and with what BB (or was it you?) said abotu light (or was it sound- lol- my mind is shot htis am) beign able transport the message- but I haven’t quite made hte connection yet between the two lines of htought.
Also, as I recall, his paper was thick on theology and thin on science.
My interest was due to this observed correlation between light and sound, which betty boop and I cite in our book Timothy:
The results were presented as plots of slight temperature variations in the CMB that graph sound waves in the dense early universe. These high-resolution power spectra show not only a strong primary resonance but are consistent with two additional harmonics, or peaks.
The peaks indicate harmonics in the sound waves that filled the early, dense universe. Until some 300,000 years after the Big Bang, the universe was so hot that matter and radiation were entangled in a kind of soup in which sound waves (pressure waves) could vibrate. The CMB is a relic of the moment when the universe had cooled enough so that photons could decouple from electrons, protons, and neutrons; then atoms formed and light went on its way.
Paul Preuss, The Universe May Be Flat But It Is Nevertheless Musical, Science Beat, Berkeley Lab (June 5, 2001); read it at http://www.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/cmb-harmonics.html