Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark
Your failure to answer questions presented and look for non-existent insults only marks your intellectual honesty as comparable of that to Chris Dodd’s. The manner in which you refuse to answer questions, while demanding answers to your own, and reading [beliefs/non-beliefs] into the reply is that which the most dogmatic ‘evolutionary scientists’ contort any findings to preclude a contradiction to any evolutionary theory.

Nice one. Show me a question of yours that I refused to answer.

One.

See, if I REALLY wanted to insult you, I would.

Go for it.

223 posted on 03/29/2009 7:25:32 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe; Buck W.; Alamo-Girl; xzins; enat; GodGunsGuts; D-fendr; starlifter; Seven_0; MHGinTN; ...
Show me a question of yours that I refused to answer.

One.

How about many?

Post 37
In the creation story, Adam is created first then, after naming all the animals and failing to find a helpmeet, God creates a woman for him. Later on in the bible, Jesus says “Do you not know that in the beginning God created man and woman, male and female, He created them.”

Is Jesus misinformed, or lying then? Or is the point not that there was some time elapsed between the creation of the male and female of the human species, BUT instead that GOD created them, together in the sense of meaning to complete each other?

Post 71
(The creation-story appears again, right there in Genesis wherein God creates man and woman at the same time in that account.) Do you mean to say then that, because things SHOULD be read literally, always, that BOTH accounts are factually true down to minuta even though on the literal side they contradict each other?

Post 71 - Set 2
Answer this: How can there be a meaningful conversation when you have already condemned me? How can I present a defense of my views when you refuse to listen?

Post 71 - Set 3
Was answered, Correction needed.
Zacheeus* Nicodemus asked Jesus "How can a man be born again? Can he enter his mother's womb a second time?" This was a perfectly valid question to a very literal taking of Jesus's own words. But is that what Jesus was talking about?

* - I confused Zacheus for Nicodemus in the original post.

Post 214
It could be argued that these are not technically questions. Now, I ask you to answer my questions. I also ask how that keeping the sabbath precludes an literary reading.

225 posted on 03/29/2009 7:54:23 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson