Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
You are quite mistaken. According to evolutionary meteorology, Noah's flood is impossible. According to evolutionary geology the world is millions of years old. Etc, etc. When you look at the same data from a Creation Science perspective, we find that the biblical creation model is far superior to the materialistic fairytales being pumped out by Temple of Darwin devotees in white lab coats.
159 posted on 03/26/2009 10:42:19 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: GodGunsGuts
According to evolutionary meteorology, Noah's flood is impossible.

According to meteorlogy, period, the water cycle makes Noah's flood impossible. According to geology, period, the world is millions of years older than what you claim. Neither of those require Darwin or his theories for support.

When you look at the same data from a Creation Science perspective

Creation science is a contradiction in terms.

161 posted on 03/26/2009 10:47:39 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

On another thread, you mention you believe in the de-evolution of “kinds” to the species seen today.

For you to believe in DE-evolution, evolution must exist.
Therefore you believe in evolution!


163 posted on 03/26/2009 10:51:10 AM PDT by Wacka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson