As do I. Sadly, the RM has allowed an ill-fitting caucus label to be invented.
But I was only asking a question as to what your particular link had to do with the subject at hand. I see no reference to the rapture there.
“topcat54” you were saying to “XeniaSt” — But I was only asking a question as to what your particular link had to do with the subject at hand. I see no reference to the rapture there.
—
I’m trusting that XeniaSt is going to let us (the readers) know. If there is something there, that pertains to the Rapture (and I believe that’s the answer I got back), then I would like to hear about it. And I would like to see that “framework” — in the same sense and the same way that those other proponents of the “Seven Festivals of the Messiah” give their framework for what they present. I would like to “see the picture” that is being presented in relation to the Rapture...
===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== =====
And you also said, topcat54 — As do I. Sadly, the RM has allowed an ill-fitting caucus label to be invented.
—
Ummm..., I can’t say that it’s an ill-fitting caucus label. I agree with the designation of it being for pre-trib, mid-trib and pre-wrath. That fits the idea of the commonality of all these people and their positions.
They all have a common identity and common position, even if they are slightly different in timing. They all fit a “major position” of the Church, in regards to the Rapture, and thus — they should all be allowed to discuss this — within this group and amongst themselves. It’s very helpful for these people to come together and not be hassled about the “very concept” of the Rapture being viable, in the context that they support.