In all seriousness, I didn’t call Lee N. Field an idiot, fool, deceiver, numb scull, etc. for believing preterism (or rather amillenialism). I stated it was his poison. And who has used any of those terms, I'm just wondering?
Then of course there is the fact that you didn’t even take the time to actually figure out whether he was, in fact, a preterist. What that an exhibition of humility and patience, or were you were just looking for an opportunity to attack.
It’s not even clear you know the difference, e.g., “believing preterism (or rather amillenialism)”.
Jesus doesn’t like hypocrites.
"And who has used any of those terms, I'm just wondering?"
You have many times on FR used similar language.
Even in this very post to me you are implying that I am a hypocrite.
++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Then of course there is the fact that you didn’t even take the time to actually figure out whether he was, in fact, a preterist."
That's why I said "probable". But Lee N. Field corrected me.
Incidentally, why are you acting like my misidentification of Lee N. Field as a preterist is an "attack" on him? Being that you are a preterist I find that very humorous.
++++++++++++++++++++++++
"It’s not even clear you know the difference, e.g., “believing preterism (or rather amillenialism)”.
I do know the difference - and the similarity.
Their are similar in that they are both wrong and out of step with the Bible.