[[Why are you writing on the subject of abiogenesis if you aren’t familiar with the most important researchers?]]
Why are you tryign to derail the thread by ignoring hte FACT that this article exposes those ‘important researchers’ as clueless abotu how information could supposedly arise via natural processes? This whole article exposes the fact that it is impossible for metainfo to arise from non life- it can’t happen- IF you have soemthign worthwhile to contribute to the article’s precepts, do feel free to contribute- but tryign to discredit the article by pointign to abiogenisis researchers, and their ASSUMPTION driven claims that DEFY the actual observed science of information, and it’s observable limits and or abilites, isn’t a valid coutner argument.
That's for experimenters to decide. If ID proponents and creationists want to make such claims they need to get some lab work done and publish some experimental data.
Actually I posted links to laboratory work, not assumptions.