Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts; Alamo-Girl; betty boop; hosepipe; metmom

Let me just add that I think though, at this point, that it would actually require an even greater predesigned metainfo on the part of cells, systems and ulitimately species as a whole in order to ‘intelligently’ receive, decode and use messages that contained a multiplier effect message- pointing more strongly to the need for, and utilization of, anticipation on the part of metainfo to decode not only hte message, but info outside of hte actual message. (Not sure ‘outside of’ is hte correct term- as additional message within the message itself would have to be forknown by hte receiver- however, this very point is where the macroevo will argue variety of decoding could have evovled in a by gosh by golly manner of accidental results- not sure this is a valid line of argument though). Will have to think htis through a bit more- if osmeone has somethign to add, I’d appreciate it- might spark another line of htought for one of us.


677 posted on 02/09/2009 9:23:36 AM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 676 | View Replies ]


To: GodGunsGuts; Alamo-Girl; betty boop; hosepipe; metmom

[[All sender-receiver members need to be on the same ‘wavelength’ before it is possible to determine what needs to be transmitted in the coded message.]]

Another good point that probably should be developped more- This ‘same wavelength’ statement indicates that both sender and receiver NEED to be PREDESIGNED to utilize the message being transmitted in the first place- IF the receiver doesn’t understand code, the message is useless, and the sender is sending out nothign but goobeldygook which the receiver won’t be able to decode and utilize- the fact that cells can and do receive and understand the message and even hte miltiplier effects of the message indicate a designed assembly right form the get go- For the receiver to have waited aroudn millions of years while the sender and the receiver ‘got hteir act together’ in order to get themselves o nthe ‘same wavelength’ while nature manipulated the message via mistake after mistake is ismply an unreasonable position to take- hte ‘species’ would die off in very quick order awaiting this synchronization of decoding ability for hte receiver. Especially so when it comes to more andm ore complex information. Every minute change in the genome code would have to then wait millions of more years while the receiver got it’s act together so that it could properly understand the message and miltiplier effect of hte message, while it went htrough the tedious process of ‘mistake to sensible code’ via mutations, and again, the whole system would simply die off in very short order.


678 posted on 02/09/2009 9:40:14 AM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 677 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson