What do you mean by “beyond its kind”? Can you cite a reference that gives an objective definition, so that everyone could agree?
[[What do you mean by “beyond its kind”? Can you cite a reference that gives an objective definition, so that everyone could agree?]]
Yes, let’s play that game JS- you know, the one where you try to prove ‘species change’ by pointing out dead end speciation, when it is clear enough that kind means species do NOT change beyond their own kinds- You know full well what kind means- but to support your theory- you need it not mean adaptation of species within their own kinds.
I think we can ll agree that you know full well that htere is no evidence of species ever goign beyond hteir own kinds, and I think we can all agree that you’ll continue fienging ignorance of what kind means
[[What do you mean by “beyond its kind”? Can you cite a reference that gives an objective definition, so that everyone could agree?]]
And furthermore JS Kind is farm ore precise than the generalizations given by phyologeny- but that of course doesn’t bother you eh?