Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138; Diamond; betty boop
Er, if I may, a "code" has two uses in successful communications (Shannon information) - the sender for encoding, the receiver for decoding.

The sender and receiver must speak the same language. The sender must have foreknowledge of the code, how it will decoded by the receiver. Hence, the foreknowledge.

Again, the Wimmer experiment like Szostak's planned experiment (according to his bio) - began with the message. The code was presupposed along with autonomy and information (Shannon, successful communication.)


386 posted on 01/29/2009 10:50:50 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies ]


To: Alamo-Girl
Again, the Wimmer experiment like Szostak's planned experiment (according to his bio) - began with the message. The code was presupposed along with autonomy and information (Shannon, successful communication.)

The question remains whether chemical evolution can lead to a genome based replicator. So far it's all been pre-game show and the associated trash talk. I'm looking forward to the game, which will take place in the laboratory.

My problem with ID and related criticisms of evolution is that they have downplayed or dismissed the need to test hypotheses.

387 posted on 01/29/2009 10:56:05 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson