Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop
Your statement seems a tad hyperbolic to me, js1138, or at least a sweeping over-generalization.

Single-celled organisms do not undergo Apoptosis or necrosis. Is that clearer?

348 posted on 01/28/2009 3:18:57 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies ]


To: js1138; doc30; Alamo-Girl
Single-celled organisms do not undergo Apoptosis or necrosis. Is that clearer?

Well yes, js1138 — thank you for the clarification!

A couple thoughts. It seems to me that apoptosis and necrosis must be quantified by different information measures, since — while both lead to death — one is an "orderly" or "controlled" process, and the other a "random" process. The distinction between the two seems to be a purely "informational" one.

Another thing, "biological immortality" is, as you know, a technical term currently in favor in some circles of biology. It describes the situation where a sustained, cumulative increase in the rate of mortality as a function of chronological age is absent. Biological entities so characterized are said to be exempt from the Hayflick limit, which is essentially a description of the situation in which cells no longer divide.

But to extend "biological immortality" beyond the range of this narrow, technical understanding would be absurd.

For there is no logical sense whatever in claiming that a being incapable of death was ever actually alive in the first place. Or so it seems to me, FWIW.

365 posted on 01/28/2009 10:53:49 PM PST by betty boop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson