[CottShop]

[[Wrong is wrong no matter how sensitive the wrong people are.]]

You have neither provided evidence ID or IC is wrong, you’ve only offered your subjective opinion o nthe matter- laced with petty childish insults about htose you dissagree with theologically- this is posted i nthe religion forum, and it was posted here for a reason- to keep the petty insults out, and to facilitate a civil discussion about the article posted, which you have completely ignored- Your insults are meant for nothign more htna derailing htreads with petty side arguments- there are different rules i nthis forum, and if you can’t step it up to abide by them, then as I mentioned, I’ll report your posts myself.

[Filo]

You have neither provided evidence ID or IC is wrong

I also haven't provided evidence to refute that 2+2=Buick or that the moon is made of green cheese. Do I need to?

ID is so patently wrong that providing "evidence" to refute it gives more credence than it is worth.

you dissagree with theologically

As long as you admit that there is nothing but faith involved in the article or your support of it then I'm fine.

Lacing the article with pseudo-science, however, has nothing to do with theology regardless of where the post resides and it reeks of dishonesty.

ID is not science and can never be. Scientists seek answers to questions and pursue those answers methodically, honestly and openly. ID poses an answer and seeks support for it, often creating that support out of whole cloth.