No, I hit it right on the head... of course.
No, I hit it right on the head... of course.
No allmendream...you really didn’t even swing in the right direction.
If anything, you’re flailing about and hitting yourself upside the head.
OF COURSE the materialist/naturalist will see every scientific problem in no other way BUT naturalistic/materlialistic,
while ignoring the fact that this just doesn’t apply when it comes to big bang theory, string theory, multiverse theory, etc. etc. etc.
Not to mention psychology, psychiatry, other areas of medicine, etc.
Then add all the subjectivity influencing interpretation of data, influenced by ideology, politics, money...
as I said before, some astronomers still disagree about reclassifying pluto, and then there’s manmade global warming.
The projection irony alert was that you just described yourself with the hammer and nail comments to a T.
But since you’re incapable of seeing science in any other dogmatic way but those I described, I suppose it won’t come to anyone’s surprise that you’ll be unable to appreciate your post for the projection irony it truly was either.