Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl

[[I have not made mistakes on this issue.]]

Neither you nor BB did make a mistake- Allmen is conflating hte issue, and making it seem as though you and BB were tryign to say something neither of you were- He/she went from arguing about hte containment of info, to the conveying of informaiton in an attempt ot make it look as though you said somethign you didn’t

[[They do have information content in that they are necessarily part of the channel, much like a land line would be to a phone conversation. But they are not the message, nor the successful communication of the message.]]

It is clear from your posts previous that htis is exactly what you and Betty are stating-

[[Jeepers. I can’t believe I actually said it all over again.]]

Ther’es no need to explain- You both did fineeverythign you stated is correct- Allmen is now attemptign to confuse hte issue by claiming that


147 posted on 01/27/2009 12:23:09 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop
Thank you so very much for your encouragements, dear brother in Christ!

An old truism among lawyers about closing arguments is that if the facts are in your favor, argue the facts. If they aren't, argue the law. If neither, pound the table.


258 posted on 01/27/2009 8:36:56 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson