Indeed, many DNA’s would not be transcribed into RNA’s that would be turned into functional proteins if not for the “message” received by a protein at the cell surface, transduced to other signaling pathways involving proteins, that result in an active protein transcription factor binding to the promoter region of the DNA it is to transcribe to make a necessary subset of proteins to respond to the signal the cell received.
To deny that proteins convey messages is once again, to betray your ignorance of the subject. Even worse you are apparently unwilling or unable to learn and thus rectify your ignorance of the subject.
[[Proteins not only have information content, they are also able to alter and pass along a molecular “message” in Signal Transduction.]]
Yes, when acted upon.
[[To deny that proteins convey messages is once again, to betray your ignorance of the subject.]]
On their own, they do not convey anything- if htere is nothign else present to convey that message to, then it is simply a static message without puropose in relation to a system whole. Why you insist on this symatic line of attack is beyond me- apparently you don’t wish to discuss the problem of hte rise of info in a stepwise manner that hte article is talkign about because it presents a HUGE problem for macroeovlutionary claims about life from non life?
==To deny that proteins convey messages is once again, to betray your ignorance of the subject. Even worse you are apparently unwilling or unable to learn and thus rectify your ignorance of the subject.
Look who’s talking...LOL. Except in your case, when you are finally caught dead-to-right, you simply update your ignorance by plagiarizing your opponents argument and then pretend that that is what you meant all along. You should apply for a position in Bob Gallo’s lab. I hear they are always looking for people like you.