So, someone who honestly questions the posting of a contentious article against Christians on Christmas Day is the problem, for you?
No. The problem I’m having with YOU is that no matter what restornu says, you will find something in it to argue about.
It would seem to me that all you are doing is looking for something to argue about. I’m not impressed. Arguing religion and politics are futile, go-nowhere arguments that usually turn out to be “my side is better than your side, so THERE!”
If you think the article is contentious, take it up with the authors of the quotes.
As for restornu posting a “contentious” article, for someone who wants off the ping list, you seem to be enjoying yourself at the expense of other people. I’m happy for you. </sarc
I like you have no clue why you feel the need to defend something that really isn’t about Christianity but about creeds and stuff shirts!
Meaning some of the prominent Americans did not know how to deal with those who are so opinionated at the exclusion of others.
so it seems as always if the message is contrary to ones comfort zone, to attack the messenger instead of why they said, what they said.
In spite of the zealots the founders of our wonderful Constitution were Divinely Inspired the very fact they did not get caught up in creeds but were able to receive what God from heaven wanted for this nation.