[metmom]

Frankly, I think you are doing the creator a disservice to shut your eyes and plug your ears to the elegant, beautiful process that is evolution.

IF he designed it that way and He says He didn't.

Misinterpreting variation within species, as species to species evolution does more than a disservice to the Creator if one attributes to *natural* causes something that never happened.

For all the evos talk about an affront to the Creator by not accepting evolution, what about the affront to the Creator by calling Him a liar when they say that He didn't create things the way He said He did?

[Bosh Flimshaw]

For all the evos talk about an affront to the Creator by not accepting evolution, what about the affront to the Creator by calling Him a liar when they say that He didn't create things the way He said He did?

At least you are honest about the fact that your belief is not based on science, but on your version of your particular faith.

[tpanther]

Misinterpreting variation within species, as species to species evolution does more than a disservice to the Creator if one attributes to *natural* causes something that never happened.

They all but make the argument that evolution IS itself intelligent design.

Curious this coming from the crowd that exclaims God has no place in science class, eh?

Then they turn right around and sue people for disagreeing with evolution and call each and every observation of the gaping holes in evolution "religious".

There's no reasoning with the unreasonable metmom.