Mine was #98. Your response was #100. You saw it, obviously.
You just didn’t deal with the issues I raised in response to your request for my specific criticism of the article - except the following ad hominem attacks.
Whatever.
In #98 you did not offer anything of substance. Why are the hermeneutics poor? Which are the instances of eisegesis? It is not a personal attack to ask for specific criticism, and that is what I did.