To: guitarplayer1953
Gal 2:9 James, and Cephas, and John. No proof of any greater authority can be drawn from the placing or numbering of James first, which perhaps St. Paul might do, because of the great respect he knew the Jewish converts had for St. James, bishop of Jerusalem, where the ceremonies of the law of Moses were still observed. Several Greek copies have Peter, James, and John. So we also read in St. Jerome's Commentary, p. 240, and St. John Chrysostom in his Exposition, p. 729, has Cephas, John, and James. (Witham)
50 posted on
07/29/2008 5:30:54 PM PDT by
Petronski
(Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
To: Petronski
You use the same argument for Peter when he is mentioned first so what is it? Can't have it both ways.
52 posted on
07/29/2008 5:33:42 PM PDT by
guitarplayer1953
(Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness)
To: Petronski
From Haydock’s Commentaries.
53 posted on
07/29/2008 5:34:13 PM PDT by
Petronski
(Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson