To: Petronski
Peter never signed any letters as the Pope of Rome. Your example of ww1 and ww2 is not valid, David called himself the King he was not named the King after his death as King David the 1st.
Now James the brother of Jesus did use that name and stated so himself that he was the brother of Jesus one of a number of brothers and sister.
44 posted on
07/29/2008 4:59:15 PM PDT by
guitarplayer1953
(Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness)
To: guitarplayer1953
Peter never signed any letters as the Pope of Rome.Of course he didn't. He never was "Pope of Rome," whatever that means.
He was, however, Pope Peter I, First Vicar of Christ.
45 posted on
07/29/2008 5:05:54 PM PDT by
Petronski
(Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
To: guitarplayer1953
Now James the brother of Jesus did use that name and stated so himself that he was the brother of Jesus one of a number of brothers and sister.Accident of translation.
46 posted on
07/29/2008 5:10:53 PM PDT by
Petronski
(Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson