First off it wasn't him that was challenged, it was me, so I doubt he spent two days. Second off, there was no time limit, but only several posters who doubted there wasn't even one.
And not one has been shown, yet. The last candidate had the word generally, which implies exceptions.
I have to point out that we seem to be being asked to defend two charges. Please pick one. Have we or some of us said that NO non-catholics can get into heaven, as initially charged (and initially -- and still -- denied), or have we or some of us written nasty posts, as initially and still admitted.
I will say again. This making a charge and then pressing the attack on quite another matter seems to be a common tactic. You still have not presented a single instance of the charge you made. We have admitted that we are sometimes far less than gracious. So why go back to that second point when the first point is what you brought up?