[fproy2222]

First off, you are using Joseph's direct writings, and the second hand writings of others and comparing them to just Paul's first hand writings.
=+=+=

So he is comparing apples to apples?

I can see where that would be a problem for you. As I am rapidly learning by reading them, first hand sources are the last thing the LDS wants to go by.

+++++++++++++++

If you study what I said, then remember that you forgot to highlight the part that says some of the accounts are from others (look at post 146 to see what he highlighted and what he passed over by leaving it small, I do not know how to add bold type) you would see that you would have to say that:

apples + oranges = apples

Did you intend to mislead on purpose, or was it a mistake on your part?

[ejonesie22]

No mistake, you said BOTH direct writings and second hand writings, not either or. Direct writings from Smith vs. Direct writings from Paul, both can be weighed the same, at least as evidence.

Misleading is your game, not mine.

[MHGinTN]

Bwahahaha you, resty-fred, the master at pretending confusion in order to deceive, ask such a question?

[ejonesie22]

look at post 146 to see what he highlighted and what he passed over by leaving it small, I do not know how to add bold type)

BTW that he WAS ME.

I marked in bold where you were saying both Smith and Paul's DIRECT work, again apples to apples...

I can't see why this is hard, but I understand, your training runs long and deep, heavy on the rhetoric, very, very lite on the logic...