"So, all things said by Jesus prior to the crucifixion can be dismissed because he was talking to the Jews before the abolition of the law?" Point to where anyone has inferred that anything Jesus taught can or should be dismissed? I'm sorry for your deep hole and the lack of good sunshine down there, but I'm not bringing any more ladders if you're not going to stop digging.
>> “So, all things said by Jesus prior to the crucifixion can be dismissed because he was talking to the Jews before the abolition of the law?” Point to where anyone has inferred that anything Jesus taught can or should be dismissed? <<
You explained that when he said repent or commanded any work that it didn’t count as a disproving sola fides because he was talking to Jews before the resurrection: “Prior to the crucifixion, ALL Jews (including The Son of God there with them) were under the Mosaic law, ... The Jews were still under the law of sin and death.” But the entire gospel consists of what he said to Jews before the resurrection. If I misunderstood your basis for discounting the command of Jesus, please correct me.