Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Forest Keeper; annalex; Gamecock; wmfights; Dr. Eckleburg; Alex Murphy; Quix; P-Marlowe
No, the Fathers were commentators, NOT drafters. It is NOT the same and the distinction is clear.

Apparently the distinction is not clear, since the "tradition" that they wrote of is considered equal of Scripture. Although, their writings were their opinions and are not God Breathed.

3,030 posted on 08/15/2008 8:41:48 PM PDT by wmfights (Believe - THE GOSPEL - and be saved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3027 | View Replies ]


To: wmfights; annalex; Gamecock; Dr. Eckleburg; Alex Murphy; Quix; P-Marlowe
FK to Annalex: No, the Fathers were commentators, NOT drafters. It is NOT the same and the distinction is clear.

Apparently the distinction is not clear, since the "tradition" that they wrote of is considered equal of Scripture. Although, their writings were their opinions and are not God Breathed.

Yes, that's all I can figure. That means that those writings of the Fathers that were the most popular, the ones that passed the vote, must be considered equal or superior to God's OWN word. But really, we already know the answer to that because extra-scriptural tradition declares what the scripture means without regard to other scripture. Therefore, that tradition trumps the scriptures. I think it would have been more sporting if they had let the Bible defend itself, but then that would have spoiled all the "secrets of the deposit of faith" which contradict scriptures. I guess if one has the power, why take any chances? :)

3,039 posted on 08/16/2008 12:36:02 AM PDT by Forest Keeper (It is a joy to me to know that God had my number, before He created numbers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3030 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson