[Grig]

“Revisionist rubbish calculated to serve the fevered imaginings of Mormon fables”

So then point out where in the article you think history was revised and provide evidence to back up your claims.

If you can that is.

[magisterium]

We'll start with the first paragraph. The "Dark Ages" were not nearly so dark as you might suppose, at least in matters of faith. And anyone claiming to be a Christian, while simultaneously claiming that the Renaissance and Reformation (I thought ALL Christian denominations before J. Smith were "apostate" and an "abomination"!) paved the way for some sort of glorious Restoration, ought to have his head examined. The article goes downhill from there, in ways too numerous for me to pick apart piece-by-piece while here at work. Suffice it to say that, when one routinely confuses results with intentions because he understands neither, he is on a fool's errand. Much like this author.