To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan
That's more believable than the atheist's, (e.g. Dawkins), ex nihilo explanation for sure.If that's a good explaination, then the argument isn't with evolution, but with atheism.
71 posted on
06/14/2008 10:09:27 AM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
If that's a good explanation, then the argument isn't with evolution, but with atheism. Yes
A true and consistent evolutionist can't admit to the possibility of a god. If he were to do so the whole theory and the positivist philosophy behind it would unravel.
So he has to keep his finger in the dike so to speak.
74 posted on
06/14/2008 10:33:16 AM PDT by
Donald Rumsfeld Fan
("Sincerity is everything. If you can fake that, youÂ’ve got it made." Groucho Marx)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson