Replies

No such evidence exists to my knowledge. Even if you were able to scrape up even one such piece of evidence, I think it would be hard to hold a global theory based on it. Science should be about probability and preponderance of evidence via the scientific method, not conjecture based on a possible scrawny single piece of evidence.

OK, look at the Larus genus - the seagull. They are considered a ring species. Species that live close to each other can breed, but the further apart they live the less likely they can breed, to the point where a few species simply cannot inter-breed at all.

Remember, in science a single negative will destroy a theory. We have here a single negative for ID. Something that pokes a BIG hole in ID, and supports evolution at the same time.

And you still have not presented any evidence for ID that could not also apply to evolution. Unlike the evidence of the Larus genus of gulls.

And you still have not presented any evidence for ID that could not also apply to evolution.

If you're going to allow yourself to believe that DNA, the design of the ear, the intricacies of the eye, the brain, etc, etc, etc, are explainable by mindless evolution, then I can't help you PugetSoundSoldier. That is truly blind faith.