Don't presume to lecture me on evolution -- half of my areas/fields at the Ph.D. level were in evolution and fossil man. And you probably scanned a page or two at Answers In Genesis, then stayed at a Holiday Inn Express.
And you are totally wrong in each and every sentence you wrote.
Why creationists presume to be able to define what the theory of evolution is, and what it contains, on the basis of their religious beliefs is the biggest farce of all.
Maybe you got a PHD in a certain field, but at its core it is based on assumptions and beliefs. Yep, those are ‘in science’ too.
The hard truth, the evolutionist is not doing science but his religion.
“In 1872 Darwin was refused membership in the prestigious Zoological Section of the French Institute for which they gave the following reason:
” . . .the Origin of Species and still more the Descent of Man, is not science but a mass of assertions and absolutely gratuitous hypothesis, often evidently fallacious. This kind of publication and these theories are a bad example, which a body that respects itself cannot encourage.” (From Life and Letters of Charles Darwin Vol.111, pp.224, note.)”
So, then, you have half a degree in evolution?