Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim 0216
There’s no evidence of this kind of migration of species from on to another. Yet evidence of intelligent purpose in the design of living things and their components is everywhere.

But you will accept that if I can show evidence of that kind of migration - two species that cannot breed, but all the inter-species can breed with each other - then we have an example of evolution?

Regardless of whether or not you believe such evidence exists, are you willing to accept that bar for evidence for evolution?

128 posted on 06/14/2008 3:30:59 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: PugetSoundSoldier
But you will accept that if I can show evidence of that kind of migration - two species that cannot breed, but all the inter-species can breed with each other - then we have an example of evolution? Regardless of whether or not you believe such evidence exists, are you willing to accept that bar for evidence for evolution?

No such evidence exists to my knowledge. Even if you were able to scrape up even one such piece of evidence, I think it would be hard to hold a global theory based on it. Science should be about probability and preponderance of evidence via the scientific method, not conjecture based on a possible scrawny single piece of evidence.

Compare that to the innumerable pieces of evidence of design in living things that show clear evidence of intent and purpose pointing to intelligence behind the design. ID is robust, whereas Darwinism is paltry. There's no comparison.

165 posted on 06/14/2008 10:40:36 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson