Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim 0216
Darwinism isn't true science since it doesn't have evidence of species migrating to another species

So if I can show proof of a species changing enough that it can no longer breed with its original grandparents, or of a species developing a new organ, would that point towards evolution?

In other words, I can show one species, several intermediate sub-species, and another species. Such that adjacent sub-species can breed, but the start and end species cannot - would that qualify as evolution?

Or if I can show a population of organisms that have a common trait, and a new population arises that contains a distinct and unique beneficial feature, and that the feature relates to changes in the evironment only, would that qualify as evolution?

125 posted on 06/14/2008 3:21:17 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: PugetSoundSoldier

There’s no evidence of this kind of migration of species from on to another. Yet evidence of intelligent purpose in the design of living things and their components is everywhere.


127 posted on 06/14/2008 3:26:32 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson