Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: papertyger

“I’ll give your explanation more weight when you produce better credentials than D.A. Carson, who subscribes to the feminine gender theory.”

I am not familiar with Carson’s work on this subject but if mine agrees with his I am elated.

“Such extravagant rationalizations would never even occur to people were it not for the Protestant aversion to the Papacy.”

My study has nothing to do with an “aversion to the Papacy”, in fact the “Papacy” does not bother me. What I do care about is an accurate exegesis of the scriptures within their historical context.


9,575 posted on 06/27/2008 8:28:16 PM PDT by enat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9544 | View Replies ]


To: enat
What I do care about is an accurate exegesis of the scriptures within their historical context. . . . as YOU interpret it.
9,584 posted on 06/27/2008 8:33:41 PM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9575 | View Replies ]

To: enat
My study has nothing to do with an “aversion to the Papacy”, in fact the “Papacy” does not bother me. What I do care about is an accurate exegesis of the scriptures within their historical context.

So what prompted you to undertake such a study in the first place? Further, what are your qualifications to undertake such a study?

9,611 posted on 06/27/2008 8:50:58 PM PDT by papertyger (Gun control laws make as much sense as giving condoms to a pregnant teen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9575 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson