Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Petronski; 1000 silverlings; OLD REGGIE; rabidralph; Iscool
If the RCC does not teach that Mary is the "co-redeemer," and yet John Paul II declared she was the co-redeemer many times while he was pope, why didn't anyone in the RCC correct the pope?

Are Catholics permitted to believe something that is contrary to the RCC catechism?

Is the pope permitted to believe something contrary to the RCC catechism?

586 posted on 06/01/2008 3:59:17 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 540 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Eckleburg
If the RCC does not teach that Mary is the "co-redeemer,"

No if, just fact.

... and yet John Paul II declared she was the co-redeemer many times while he was pope

Declared, eh? Define declared. There was no declaration of Catholic doctrine.

...why didn't anyone in the RCC correct the pope?

Correct what?

759 posted on 06/01/2008 7:14:55 PM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 586 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Are Catholics permitted to believe something that is contrary to the RCC catechism? Is the pope permitted to believe something contrary to the RCC catechism?

I wish I was sure you knew what catechism means.

761 posted on 06/01/2008 7:16:18 PM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 586 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson