Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Eckleburg
No supernatural intact virginity of Mary after Christ's birth.

What is this creepy protestant obsession with Mary's hymen?

5,724 posted on 06/14/2008 12:29:29 PM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5721 | View Replies ]


To: Petronski; Alex Murphy
What is this creepy protestant obsession with Mary's hymen?

It's creepy, alright, but it's not coming from the Protestants, but from Rome. No one would have thought two seconds about it until Rome concocted the ridiculous, blasphemous error that somehow Mary's hymen was still intact after the birth of Christ.

What a God-awful pretense. What a denial of Christ's humanity. What an idolatrous, bogus pretension to foist off on the mother of Christ.

To base such anti-Scriptural nuttiness on a few words by Aquinas and the ravings of Pope Paul IV's "Cum quorundam" at the Council of Trent is ludicrous.

It's the RCC who is preoccupied with Mary's supposed intact virginity after the birth of Christ. I guess the RCC would have to make these idiotic claims for it to believe all the rest of the blasphemy that followed.

5,729 posted on 06/14/2008 12:39:48 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5724 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson