[Petronski]

Mark, your errors pop up too often to be coincidence or even carelessness. It would seem, after so many instances like this, your misstatements are intentional.

Dr. Eckleburg, your errors pop up too often to be coincidence or even carelessness. It would seem, after so many instances like this, your misstatements about Catholicism are intentional.

I think both of these statements are "making it personal," but it's not my call.

Both statements will stand or fall on the RM's decision.

[Dr. Eckleburg]

Well, Mark said I didn't give him a list of verses and I certainly did give him a list of verses, as the evidence shows.

Disagreeing over WHAT is said is not the same thing as denying that someone has actually answered you when they clearly have.

It was either an oversight or intentional. Since Mark actually responded to my post, it certainly looks like he read my post, realized I had responded to his post and yet he denied it.

What's that called? A senior moment? An oversight? An error?

[Religion Moderator]

It would seem ... your misstatements are intentional

The above is academic, i.e. as if an arms-length or third party assessment. So whereas it is technically not "making it personal" it is pushing the envelope.