***The statement was made that none of the Deuterocanonical verse was to be found in the NT.
Not so. Please be more careful.***
Shall I go back and find the actual post? Why don’t I? Obviously memories are inadequate and the intake of lithium is insufficient.
***
The Worship of Mary? (An Observation) [Open]
Friday, June 13, 2008 12:38:17 PM · 5,371 of 5,540
Dr. Eckleburg to MarkBsnr; John Leland 1789; fortheDeclaration; Uncle Chip; Quix; Alex Murphy; Gamecock; ...
The Apocrypha never claims to be inspired. Nor is the Apocrypha ever quoted in the New Testament, not even once.
The Jewish canon, the early church, Josephus, Melito, Origen, Eusebius, Hilary, Jerome, Cyril, all rejected the Apocrypha as outside the accepted, inspired canon of Scripture....***
Reggie, Reggie, Reggie. The record stands. Your claim is rejected. Your statement is wrong and mine is right.
Any comments? You might want to consider your post in which you asked for a Lutheran Bible after I informed you that Luther had added “alone” to faith in deliberate error, instead of a German version of Luther’s translation. You still have not replied as to why you would do such a thing.
I’m sure the claim was made on an anti-Catholic website and someone took it as gospel and reposted it without checking for veracity.
(Dr. Eckleburg) "The Apocrypha never claims to be inspired. Nor is the Apocrypha ever quoted in the New Testament, not even once."
Reggie, Reggie, Reggie. The record stands. Your claim is rejected. Your statement is wrong and mine is right.
Is English your native language? No quotations. No instance wherein the verse in question is exclusive to the Apocrypha. NOT ONE!