No proof. No case.
Second, if I were, the Protestant rules of criminal, as established on US7’s previous thread, are that it is up to the accused to quell all reasonable doubts of innocence. As I said before, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Goes around, comes around, etc.
But, third, I am not making a case (in case the red-hazed eyes of my antagonists overlooked it the first time). I don't care who believes me. I have learned enough on FR and in my life to know that some perps don't remember or understand what they did, and it's a waste of time to try to get them to do so.
And I am learning even more about the probity of some of the opposition in their minimizing or absent admissions.
But, finally my immune system has kicked in. I titrate high in antibodies to rabies, and I am titrating higher than ever in antibodies to rabid soi-disant debaters.
If anger is what they like, may they enjoy it. If anger is an affliction, may they be cured. I will not enhance their enjoyment or hasten or abet their cure by being hooked by their problems.