Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: rollo tomasi

I don’t think anyone assumed Christ would have come down from the cross. I followed the discussion back to where the question was posed as a thought experiment. Perhaps I missed where someone answered yes.


3,506 posted on 06/06/2008 11:34:11 AM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3496 | View Replies ]


To: Petronski

It was assumed either way. My take on the subject was a definite “No” or “Sorry, can’t do that”.


3,511 posted on 06/06/2008 11:38:12 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3506 | View Replies ]

To: Petronski

“I followed the discussion back to where the question was posed as a thought experiment.”

So moving on from the general Protestant assumption that the answer to the originally posed question regarding the time and manner of Jesus’ sacrifice is in fact “no,” let’s review the wedding at Cana.

Is it the assumption of Protestants that the Blessed Virgin brought the lack of wine to Jesus attention too early but some few minutes later was in fact the divinely appointed time for Jesus to begin his ministry?


3,526 posted on 06/06/2008 11:52:48 AM PDT by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3506 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson