If I had posted an incorrect reading of the catechism you might have a point. But I didn't. I posted the exact words of the RCC catechism.
Do you really not understand how this kind of meaningless back-and-forth is just deflecting any real discussions of the words themselves and what they actually mean?
Thankfully, anyone reading these posts can see what's occuring...over and over and over.
And why.
Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm." -- 1 Timothy 1:6-7"From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling;
The exact words of the Catechism of the Catholic Church include the footnote numbers (at the least).
BTW, you know that in this instance (a) it is not the Roman Catholic Catechism, but the Catechism of the Catholic Church; and further (b) proper nouns should be capitalized.
>>Do you really not understand how this kind of meaningless back-and-forth is just deflecting any real discussions of the words themselves and what they actually mean?
Thankfully, anyone reading these posts can see what’s occuring...over and over and over.<<
Yup and the people reading this, who have any doubts can go back to the thread and read for themselves!!! Let the credibility show from the actual posts.
That thread is “Do Protestants consider Roman Catholics Christians?”
And my Dear Sister in Christ, just remember, it was not I who brought the whole thing up. But it is I that will direct posters to the ACTUAL thread to see for themselves.
I asked yesterday and have not yet received a response, but why is it that someone who is such a devout adherent to the 16th Century invention called "sola scriptura" so frequently quoting from books other than the Bible?