Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mad Dawg; Philo-Junius
I DID look it up. You’re wrong.

In the following post I have copied #2409 by Philo-Junius. The PRIMARY definition from Dictionary.com is printed in red.

It’s not just in airplanes:

Co-stars are subordinate to the stars;

1. a performer, esp. an actor or actress, who shares star billing with another.

Co-conspirators are subordinate to the main conspirators;
a fellow conspirator; associate or collaborator in a conspiracy.

Coadjutors are subordinate to suffragan bishops;
This is correct.

Co-dependents are subordinate to their dependents;
1. Mutually dependent.

we could go on and on, but really there’s little point.

I am not going to play your childish game beyond this point.

2,999 posted on 06/05/2008 9:03:56 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2815 | View Replies ]


To: OLD REGGIE
Your editing verges on the disingenuous: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/co-star co·star Audio Help /n. ˈkoʊˌstɑr; v. ˈkoʊˈstɑr/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[n. koh-stahr; v. koh-stahr] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation noun, verb, -starred, -star·ring. –noun 1. a performer, esp. an actor or actress, who shares star billing with another. 2. a performer whose status is slightly below that of a star. –verb (used without object) 3. to share star billing with another performer. 4. to receive billing of slightly less status than that of a star. –verb (used with object) 5. to present (two or more actors) as having equal billing or prominence. 6. to present as having slightly less status than that of a star.
3,002 posted on 06/05/2008 9:07:00 PM PDT by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2999 | View Replies ]

To: OLD REGGIE

Thanks for substantiating your point so well, even in the face of all this mindless deflection.


3,004 posted on 06/05/2008 9:11:17 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2999 | View Replies ]

To: OLD REGGIE
I'm not clear on WHOSE childish game it is to contradict several dictionaries and common usage.

The Boss lady and I watched "Operation Petticoat" last night. It was just as silly as I remembered from 49 years ago. It "starred" Cary Grant and Tony Curtis. It "co-starred" people whose names, listed later, I did not recognize. Here the use of "star" and "co-star" (or participial forms) I derive from the "titles" shown at the beginning of the film.

When we speak of co-dependents, usually there is one, sort of starring, sick person, the family alcoholic or whatever. Around him or her cluster people who have adopted pathological ways of acting in response to his illness. At least that's the way they were teaching it a couple of decades ago. Those people with the "secondary" sickness are the "co-dependents".

3,132 posted on 06/06/2008 5:09:43 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2999 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson