Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: netmilsmom; Dr. Eckleburg; Quix
Ok, I think I understand, but not really. I used the word link with its meaning before computers. Connected to. So the slippery term "co-Redemptrix" can't be explained, no one knows where it comes from, it could be associated with shut-down cults, or not, the onus is upon Protestants to tell Catholics where it's from if they are going to bring it up, it has been defendable in the past when it was erroneously thought to be Latin, but since it is essentially gibberish, no one wants to anymore. Or maybe they do.

That about right?

2,780 posted on 06/05/2008 2:30:07 PM PDT by 1000 silverlings (Everything that deceives also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2775 | View Replies ]


To: 1000 silverlings
So the slippery term "co-Redemptrix" can't be explained, no one knows where it comes from, it could be associated with shut-down cults, or not, the onus is upon Protestants to tell Catholics where it's from if they are going to bring it up, it has been defendable in the past when it was erroneously thought to be Latin, but since it is essentially gibberish, no one wants to anymore. Or maybe they do.

That's one way to put it.

The most charitable way to put it is this: It is not a teaching of the Catholic Church. Those who claim it is should prove it.

2,784 posted on 06/05/2008 2:36:14 PM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2780 | View Replies ]

To: 1000 silverlings

>>Ok, I think I understand, but not really. I used the word link with its meaning before computers. Connected to. So the slippery term “co-Redemptrix” can’t be explained, no one knows where it comes from, it could be associated with shut-down cults, or not, the onus is upon Protestants to tell Catholics where it’s from if they are going to bring it up, it has been defendable in the past when it was erroneously thought to be Latin, but since it is essentially gibberish, no one wants to anymore. Or maybe they do.
That about right?<<

I’m sorry, I must be thick.
Can you explain that again? Please?


2,787 posted on 06/05/2008 2:43:32 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Iron Mom. (but really made from Gold plated titanium))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2780 | View Replies ]

To: 1000 silverlings

Now Silverlings . . . we have to be charitable . . .

trying to apply linear logic to folks unused to it and more wedded to Alice-in-Wonderland-School-Of-Matrix-Theology are used to very elastic ‘logic’ that bounces all over the place and even back and forth between various centuries . . . trying, of course to miss those centuries when the LOFTY GREAT INFALLIBLE SUPREME POLITICAL POWER-MONGER was not quite up to uhhhhh Mary’s standard.


2,979 posted on 06/05/2008 8:35:35 PM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2780 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson