[1000 silverlings]

Every one is about people deemed to be “cults” that the Vatican shut down

So, for our edification, anyone who defends this "co-Redemptrix" stuff on FR, will for all intents and purposes, be linked to a shut-down cult?

[1000 silverlings]

you need a ping to this

[netmilsmom]

>>So, for our edification, anyone who defends this “co-Redemptrix” stuff on FR, will for all intents and purposes, be linked to a shut-down cult? <<

I just said that links explaining shut down “cults” are what come up on a Vatican.va search. Not that any FReeper should be linked to anything.

Maybe you have misunderstood the word “link”. It’s a computer term for a web address.

[Mad Dawg]

Look, this forum is one in which you see no problem in saying that we think that Mary existed before Creation and then not responding to a request for clarification.
It is one in which a person can plan to put up ostensible arguments not for the purpose of debate but to "drive them nuts" ...
and THEN, NOT only deny the logical necessity of that's being an instance of wishing evil to Catholics, (literally, "malevolence") but pretend to argue seriously that, well, if I intend and try to drive you nuts and you get driven nuts, it's your fault and your problem!

It is a forum in which school-yard conventions apply, in which pointing out how one's opponents hinder conversation is considered whining,
in which people put up pictures of "cry-babies" because they cannot distinguish between what is said and their own emotional projections onto the person saying it — and thus think if someone says, "There is a lot of hatred directed toward us," that person must be sad and weepy about it. They cannot or do not read an observation without assuming an array of feelings which are not in evidence.
(Similarly, they think that a person who notes that someone tried to "drive them nuts" must have been "driven nuts". No fear!)

In other words, it is not the kind of place where serious theological differences can be discussed. If this were a forum of adults committed to adult conversation, I think I could mount at least an interesting argument in favor of co-redemptrix and co-mediator.

But it's not. So I won't. If it ever becomes a forum of adults, I will attempt it, Deo volente rivoque non adsurgente.

[Marysecretary]

Hmm, verrryyyy interestink. With emphasis on the stink.