To: Mad Dawg; Dr. Eckleburg
Other posters have been defending it up until now. We have been told, repeatedly, that it is Latin and that it means “with the Redeemer”. Now that it has been pointed out to them that it’s not Latin, that it is illogical and made up, they have decided, apparently, to disown it. So it doesn’t exist. Got it
2,747 posted on
06/05/2008 2:02:57 PM PDT by
1000 silverlings
(Everything that deceives also enchants: Plato)
To: 1000 silverlings
We have been told, repeatedly, that it is Latin and that it means “with the Redeemer”. Now that it has been pointed out to them that it’s not Latin, that it is illogical and made up, they have decided, apparently, to disown it.Fanciful.
2,750 posted on
06/05/2008 2:04:31 PM PDT by
Petronski
(Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
To: 1000 silverlings
That is false. And I also see no connection between it and the post to which it is allegedly a response.
Rope-a-dope?
2,756 posted on
06/05/2008 2:06:50 PM PDT by
Mad Dawg
(Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
To: 1000 silverlings
>>Other posters have been defending it up until now. We have been told, repeatedly, that it is Latin and that it means “with the Redeemer”. Now that it has been pointed out to them that it’s not Latin, that it is illogical and made up, they have decided, apparently, to disown it. So it doesn’t exist. Got it<<
Oh it exists. I see it on the FR religion forum all the time, brought up by Non-Catholic posters. If a Catholic brought it up, ask that Catholic, but I fear one is not going to get the answer from the rest of us.
2,766 posted on
06/05/2008 2:15:58 PM PDT by
netmilsmom
(I am Iron Mom. (but really made from Gold plated titanium))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson