So is sin.
:-)
Thanks for the thoughts.
My point is that there is collaboration to "drive them nuts". This was NOT about Forum rules or propriety but adduced in the face of assertions from the other side that they just love us to pieces and, outside of their ministry to the lurkers, they only have our best interests at heart. I'm sure that's true of some of them. I have reason to believe it is not true of all of them, especially in the face of frank statements that the style of response is determined not by the argument or the person being responded to but in the interests of the poor lurkers who without being watched night and day might fall into the slough of Romanism.
AND, I wasn't in general appealing to FR/RM/Religion Forum rules, excellent though they be. I was appealing to an older legislation.
That projection of motives onto Prottys is wholesale inaccurate in my experience and perception.
I don’t know of any Protty who desires to drive any RC nuts.
1. RC’s don’t drive very well—particularly hereon.
2. encouraging RC’s to go to their Bibles is much preferred to going nuts.
I sneaked a peek at your caucus thread on ‘Don’t Feed the Trolls.’ No collaboration there, I’m sure, to drive US nuts.