Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: OLD REGGIE
Will you admit that Philo-Junius has not taken advantage of the opportunity to explain the purpose to me?

No. I have no familiarity with what you were discussing prior to his KJV comment.

Are you willing to admit you may be mistaken in your interpretation?

No. There is no interpretation. There may be fault in that what you wrote does not reflect what you mean, but my reading of what you wrote is not flawed.

BTW It was an opportunity for you to ping Philo-Junius as a step in your "bridge-building" rather than posting a veiled command that I "admit" I am all wrong.

This isn't about Philo, it's about you.

1,673 posted on 06/03/2008 5:45:00 PM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1663 | View Replies ]


To: papertyger

For the record:

Quoting English translations of scripture, even such a melodious work as the KJV, and building linguistic arguments from it, is completely unimpressive to anyone familiar with the bases of the Catholic dogma of the perpetual virginity of Mary.

Ezekiel 44:1-2

“Then he brought me back to the outer gate of the sanctuary, facing the east; but it was closed. He said to me: This gate is to remain closed; it is not to be opened for anyone to enter by it; since the LORD, the God of Israel, has entered by it, it shall remain closed.”

Why was it death for Adonijah to request the hand of the virgin Abishag?


1,732 posted on 06/03/2008 7:05:16 PM PDT by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1673 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson