>>Except the post was an extraneous slur against the KJV. If you think that’s funny laugh away. <<
Not really. It didn’t say the NJV but those who translated it.
From a Catholic’s POV, understanding that we have scholars translating meanings for us, this was in no way a slam on the King James Version of the Bible itself.
Sorry you took it that way.
Now here's an opportunity for some real bridge-building. Will you take it? Will you acknowledge you're accusing the poster of slur against the KJV, when any normative reading of what was said would recognize the poster was mocking the uneducated, dogmatic, devotees of a particular translation of the Bible?
All you have to do is admit you accused him of something he didn't do, and we'll know you are more interested in truth than "winning."
Will you admit you are ignoring his criticism of certain people deserving of criticism, and accusing him of criticizing something that would degrade his credibility if true?