To: Petronski
There is no one citation. I don’t trade chapter/verse citations like some kind of game of Go Fish.Since you can not provide a citation that Miriam only had one child. It must therefore by a pagan fable.
b'SHEM Yah'shua
1,135 posted on
06/02/2008 4:36:10 PM PDT by
Uri’el-2012
(you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
To: XeniaSt
Since you can not provide a citation that Mary only had one child. It must therefore by a pagan fable.You don't have that kind of power. It is not that I cannot, it is that I do not.
1,136 posted on
06/02/2008 4:38:34 PM PDT by
Petronski
(Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
To: XeniaSt
The counterargument, of course, is Jesus’ entrusting of Mary to St. John, which would have been unnecessary and impious (in that he was denying His brothers the chance to fulfill a mitzvoh) if He had indeed had brothers whom the law would have mandated to care for her.
1,140 posted on
06/02/2008 4:39:48 PM PDT by
Philo-Junius
(One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
To: XeniaSt; Petronski
Since you can not provide a citation that Miriam only had one child. It must therefore by a pagan fable.
This is quite possibly the faultiest logic that I have EVER seen!
1,149 posted on
06/02/2008 4:45:46 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson