Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: fortheDeclaration
Fourteen translations of the Bible that refuse to translate blasphemeo as "blaspheme" are preferable, yet the Catholic translation that renders blasphemeo as **gasp** "blaspheme" is somehow wrong.
10,155 posted on 06/30/2008 2:38:23 AM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10139 | View Replies ]


To: Petronski
Fourteen translations of the Bible that refuse to translate blasphemeo as "blaspheme" are preferable, yet the Catholic translation that renders blasphemeo as **gasp** "blaspheme" is somehow wrong.

I still have no idea what you are talking about.

I do think that the Douay-Rheims got 1Cor.1:18 correct in translating save as 'saved' not 'being saved', but ofcourse, you just reject that as quickly as you do any Bible that doesn't line up with your Church's theology.

10,681 posted on 06/30/2008 10:49:07 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Sola Scriptura, Sola Fide, Sola Gratia, Sola Christus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson