Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Ottofire

Hagee is correct. Jesus never claimed it. Others did.


5 posted on 05/29/2008 8:15:16 AM PDT by counterpunch (John McCain for President - Because we need VICTORY in Iraq, not RETREAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: counterpunch
Hagee is correct. Jesus never claimed it. Others did.

Hagge is a heretic.

John 4:25-26
The woman saith unto him, I know that Messias cometh, which is called Christ: when he is come, he will tell us all things. Jesus saith unto her, I that speak unto thee am [he]

That's pretty clear isn't it?
6 posted on 05/29/2008 8:20:50 AM PDT by The Lumster (USA - where the innocent have nothing to fear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: counterpunch

>Hagee is correct. Jesus never claimed it. Others did.

John 4:25-26, “The woman said to Him, ‘I know that Messiah is coming (He who is called Christ); when that One comes, He will declare all things to us.’ 26 Jesus said to her, ‘I who speak to you am He.’”

So what you are saying is that you reject the Scriptures, and have probably some other source for revelation that supports your statement? Please fill us in on this revelation, so that we might test it for truth.


7 posted on 05/29/2008 8:24:08 AM PDT by Ottofire (Psalm 18:31 For who is God, but the LORD? And who is a rock, except our God?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: counterpunch

No, he did claim to be the Messiah at least twice according to the article above. But he wasn’t the Messiah that the Jews were expecting...in fact he was almost the exact opposite of it. The Jews were expecting someone to lead them in an uprising against their Roman masters. What they got was someone telling them to “love their enemies”.

Interestingly, I was flipping channels yesterday morning at home and watched a few minutes of a History Channel show on crucifixion. (Why they put this on at 9 in the morning, I have no idea.) In talking about Jesus’ crucifixion, they stated that the Romans had Jesus arrested—presumably because they considered him a troublemaker and potential rebel—brought him before Pilate, and had him scourged and crucified. Not one mention of the Sanhedrin’s part in what happened, not one mention of Caiphas, not one mention of the Jewish crowd demanding His death. It’s not like I hold modern Jews responsible for Christ’s death—after all, it was all foreordained as part of God’s greater plan—but are we really so politically correct that the part the Jews of Jerusalem played in the death of Christ can’t even be mentioned anymore?

}:-)4


10 posted on 05/29/2008 8:32:04 AM PDT by Moose4 (http://moosedroppings.wordpress.com -- Because 20 million self-important blogs just aren't enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson