Posted on 05/16/2008 4:46:28 PM PDT by annalex
[The Council] relies on sacred Scripture and Tradition in teaching that this pilgrim Church is necessary for salvation. Christ alone is the mediator of salvation and the way of salvation. He presents himself to us in his Body, which is the Church. When he insisted expressly on the necessity for faith and baptism, he asserted at the same time the necessity for the Church which men would enter by the gateway of baptism. This means that it would be impossible for men to be saved if they refused to enter or to remain in the Catholic Church, unless they were unaware that her foundation by God through Jesus Christ made it a necessity.Using this conciliar doctrine as guide, we see that the Church is (in its way) as indispensable as Christ for man's salvation. The reason is that, since his ascension and the descent of the Spirit, the Church is Christ active on earth performing the salvific work for which he was sent into the world by the Father. Accordingly, the Church is necessary not only as a matter of precept but as a divinely instituted means, provided a person knows that he must use this means to be saved.
Full incorporation in the society of the Church belongs to those who are in possession of the Holy Spirit, accept its order in its entirety with all its established means of salvation, and are united to Christ, who rules it by the agency of the Supreme Pontiff and the bishops, within its visible framework. The bonds of their union are the profession of faith, the sacraments, ecclesiastical government and fellowship. Despite incorporation in the Church, that man is not saved who fails to persevere in charity, and remains in the bosom of the Church "with his body" but not "with his heart." All the Church's children must be sure to ascribe their distinguished rank to Christ's special grace and not to their own deserts. If they fail to correspond with that grace in thought, word and deed, so far from being saved, their judgment will be the more severe. (38)
So then ... it seems to be, primarily, a matter of organization.
False Catholics are spread throughout the Catholic church (witness your latest crisis) ... while false Protestants are clumped together in associations which are demonstrably outside of traditional Protestant belief and practice.
Right. Which invalidates the claim of the Holy Spirit leading all of them.
Oh ... there are many that do not even claim such a leading (by the Holy Spirit) ... and, in fact, would have no part of it.
Yes, there is an enforcement problem in the Catholic Church, but there is also unity of doctrine. That is a sign of divine guidance.
Let's face it ... you force your unity.
You cast aside any who do not agree (if they're lucky).
That's not a sign of divine guidance ... that's a sign of tyranny.
“the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire”.
the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire.
Indeed He will.
The New Testament contains five different metaphors for the foundation of the Church (Matt. 16:18, 1 Cor. 3:11, Eph. 2:20, 1 Pet. 2:56, Rev. 21:14). One metaphor that has been disputed is Jesus Christs calling the apostle Peter “rock”: “You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of hell will not prevail against it” (Matt. 16:18).
Some have tried to argue that Jesus did not mean that his Church would be built on Peter but on something else.
Some argue that in this passage there is a minor difference between the Greek term for Peter (Petros) and the term for rock (petra), yet they ignore the obvious explanation: petra, a feminine noun, has simply been modifed to have a masculine ending, since one would not refer to a man (Peter) as feminine. The change in the gender is purely for stylistic reasons.
These critics also neglect the fact that Jesus spoke Aramaic, and, as John 1:42 tells us, in everyday life he actually referred to Peter as Kepha or Cephas (depending on how it is transliterated). It is that term which is then translated into Greek as petros. Thus, what Jesus actually said to Peter in Aramaic was: “You are Kepha and on this very kepha I will build my Church.”
The Church Fathers, those Christians closest to the apostles in time, culture, and theological background, clearly understood that Jesus promised to build the Church on Peter, as the following passages show.
Just one such translation.
I suggest you review post #43 which lists the official teaching of the Catholic Church.
Please read CCC #'s 424, 552, and 881. Nowhere is it taught that the Church was built on Peter.
No argument. In post #42 you stated there was no such translation as this so I posted one for illustrative purpose. I will re-read post 43 and the CCC#s you posted but my first post in this thread reflects the teaching that I have had in the catholic church since childhood. At least my understanding of it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.