Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Truth Defender; thefrankbaum
St. John the Chrysostom asked a similar question and this is his answer:

CHRYS; And truly if Peter had not confessed that Christ was in a peculiar sense born of the Father, there had been no need of revelation; nor would he have been worthy of this blessing for confessing Christ to be one of many adopted sons; for before this they who were with Him in the ship had said, Truly you are the Son of God. Nathanael also said, Rabbi, you are the Son of God. Yet were not these blessed because they did not confess such sonship as does Peter here, but thought Him one among many, not in the true sense a son; or, if chief above all, yet not the substance of the Father. But see how the Father reveals the Son, and the Son the Father; from none other comes it to confess the Son than of the Father, and from none other to confess the Father than of the Son; so that from this place even it is manifest that the Son is of the same substance, and to be worshipped together with the Father. Christ then proceeds to show that many would hereafter believe what Peter had now confessed, whence He adds, And I say to you, that you are Peter.

Catena Aurea Matthew 16

Martha speaks these words after Christ tells her "I am the Resurrection"; likewise Nathaniel does so after Christ shows him His omniscience. But Peter confesses without leading questions, as a revealed knowledge from the Father.

74 posted on 05/13/2008 6:03:32 PM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: Truth Defender; thefrankbaum
This is what St. John had to say about Martha:
CHRYS. She seems not to have understood His words; i.e. she saw that He meant something great, but did not see what that was. She is asked one thing, and answers another.

Catena Aurea John 11


75 posted on 05/13/2008 6:07:36 PM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: annalex
St. John the Chrysostom asked a similar question and this is his answer:

While I do read the early writers, their words mean no more to me than do current writers in speaking on scriptures. All they tell us is what they think it means, and others may agree or disagree.

Martha speaks these words after Christ tells her "I am the Resurrection"; likewise Nathaniel does so after Christ shows him His omniscience. But Peter confesses without leading questions, as a revealed knowledge from the Father.

Peter, along with the other apostles, was asked a very explicit question..."But who do you say I am?" If that is not a leading question, what is? Peter and the other apostles had heard Jesus say that he is the life (resurrection)on many occasions. But, naturally, they never really took him serious until after he rose from the dead. Peter's response, I believe, was as the Holy Spirit, which is God, moved him to speak.

100 posted on 05/14/2008 11:03:19 AM PDT by Truth Defender (History teaches, if we but listen to it; but no one really listens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson