Replies

Lurkers, Godzilla is a paid Theologian, he is paid to represent his church

DU - you really can't believe this. Maybe you can, but if you do - I think you may not be in touch with reality.

But, your paranoid thoughts on Godzilla are actually a compliment. He/She is obviously very knowledgeable - and a terribly good debater.

There are quite a lot of good debate skills here on FR.

Some are horrible at it - like sevenbak. All he does is spam threads with page after page of nothing, again and again.

Godzilla is good - he is clear, and on target in every point.

I can see why you fear him.

Yeah, I’ll leave you to debate in the sandbox all you want. Rather than listening to you (or me) spout off the same arguments over and over, the hose brigade continues.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2014393/posts

If you want to debate point for point and spend the rest of you life at it, be my guest. I’ll continue to post the words written by prophets of God, anciently and currently from all corners of the word, wherever they were called.

Cheers

I Said: Lurkers, Godzilla is a paid Theologian, he is paid to represent his church

U Said: DU - you really can't believe this. Maybe you can, but if you do - I think you may not be in touch with reality.

Are you saying I should not believe Godzilla when he said he was a paid theologian?

I would never impugn his reputation bay saying he didn't tell the truth when he said that.

U Said: But, your paranoid thoughts on Godzilla are actually a compliment. He/She is obviously very knowledgeable - and a terribly good debater.

Paranoid? If everyone really is out to get you , does that realization still make you paranoid? (LOL!)

I am not paranoid, and Godzilla is terrible lizard, (Godzilla being a dinosaur that was awakened after a long sleep, and Dinosaur meaning terrible lizard) as for him being a terrible debater, I'd agree with that too.

U Said: There are quite a lot of good debate skills here on FR.

Yes, there are, unfortunately, the appreciation of those "skills" seems to depend on whether or not you are on the side of the debater employing them.

U Said: Some are horrible at it - like sevenbak. All he does is spam threads with page after page of nothing, again and again.

I find sevenbak's posts very informative, and often he hits the ball out of the park so far that you guys just call lost ball and claim it was not a home run. (it's appreciation by side of argument again)

U Said: Godzilla is good - he is clear, and on target in every point.

He's big (even bigger than my posts), He's bad (He has called me names a few times), he's mean (he has never apologized or admitted that he was wrong even when proven so), He breaths fire, OK well not actual fire... (just having fun with the name...)

I believe Godzilla is antiquated, his views are steeped in tradition, and his methods do not take into account new findings, or modern methodology he is stuck on information being peer reviewed and not just whether or not it is true (the Bible was not peer reviewed... a peer review does not make something true, ask the flat earth society, they have peers who review their stuff). From my perspective, he denies the word of God in favor of the doctrines of men for money.

You can decry my words all you want, you can laud him all you want, I am after something no man can provide.